Skip to content Skip to footer

Computer Vision Services Vs. AWS Computer Vision Services

Table of Contents

Choosing between tailoring a custom computer vision solution and leveraging the ease of AWS services depends heavily on the unique aspects of your project. Consider these important factors:

Do AWS Computer Vision Services offer the customization I need?

  • Common Tasks: AWS Rekognition excels at standard computer vision tasks (object/scene detection, facial analysis, etc.). These pre-trained models might work exceptionally well for your project.
  • Highly Specialized Needs: If your project demands image analysis that falls outside the pre-packaged abilities of AWS Rekognition, a custom-built solution becomes a significant point for consideration.

Will a custom solution be more cost-effective than AWS in the long run?

  • Initial Investment: Custom development incurs upfront costs (hardware, engineers, model development time). Long-term costs involve updates, maintenance, and scaling up as needed.
  • AWS Pricing: AWS has a pay-as-you-go model. Fluctuations in demand may mean AWS is initially more attractive but could potentially outpace a custom solution if your processing needs become very large-scale and consistent.
  • Cost Projections: Carefully model ongoing costs of both approaches using AWS cost calculators and estimates of expected in-house expenses for a proper comparison.

Can a custom solution offer unique features unavailable in AWS Computer Vision Services?

  • Full Control: Yes, a custom solution provides absolute control over algorithms, model design, and feature optimization. You can build specialized capabilities unavailable in standard service offerings.
  • Unique Requirements: If your use case requires a solution tailor-made to handle highly specific datasets or processing workflows, AWS likely won’t be able to accommodate these bespoke needs.

Is the development time for a custom solution too long compared to using AWS?

  • Project Timeline: Custom development will have a significantly longer upfront time investment compared to rapidly integrating ready-made AWS services. Assess your project timeline and weigh this carefully.
  • Long-Term Agility: Building your own solution provides more immediate agility in making iterative changes and optimizations on-demand to improve results or respond to new project requirements. This contrasts with a reliance on the feature release roadmap of AWS.

Are custom solutions generally more scalable than AWS Computer Vision Services?

  • Scalability Design: It depends on how well architected your custom solution is. With strong cloud principles, a custom solution can achieve scalability on par with AWS. However, poor design choices can lead to scaling bottlenecks.
  • AWS Scalability: AWS Rekognition is engineered for high scalability, designed to handle surges in image or video analysis automatically.
  • Scaling Your Expertise: Scaling up a custom solution often requires expanding your engineering team or investing heavily in training, which adds cost and complexity to scaling.

How difficult is it to maintain a custom computer vision solution versus using AWS?

  • AWS Maintenance: AWS handles system updates, model improvements, and security patches, vastly simplifying your maintenance load.
  • Custom Solution Maintenance: All maintenance falls on you with a custom solution. This includes updating models, patching libraries, and monitoring for performance degradation over time. This requires substantial ongoing effort from your team.

Important Consideration: Even with custom solutions, you might leverage parts of AWS infrastructure (compute instances, etc.). In those cases, you’ll still have some reliance on the AWS ecosystem that will factor into your overall maintenance.

Get the best blog stories in your inbox!