Skip to content Skip to footer

Digital transformation has revolutionized the way businesses operate, enabling organizations to leverage data and technology to gain insights and make better decisions. Machine learning, a subset of artificial intelligence, has emerged as a powerful tool for analyzing data and making predictions. However, as with any statistical technique, machine learning is subject to pitfalls, one of which is p-hacking. In this blog post, we’ll explore what p-hacking is, how it affects machine learning, and what steps organizations can take to avoid this pitfall.

Understanding P-Hacking

P-hacking, also known as data dredging or selective reporting, is a statistical practice that involves manipulating data or analysis in a way that increases the likelihood of finding a significant result. This can be done intentionally or unintentionally, and the consequences can be significant. P-hacking can take many forms, including:

  • Collecting multiple measures and only reporting the significant ones
  • Running multiple analyses and only reporting the significant ones
  • Selectively removing outliers or dropping data points
  • Changing the analysis criteria after seeing the data

The problem with p-hacking is that it can lead to false positives or exaggerated results, which can be misleading and lead to incorrect conclusions. This is especially problematic in machine learning, where the goal is to identify patterns and make predictions based on data.

How P-hacking affects Machine Learning

P-hacking can affect machine learning in several ways. First, it can lead to overfitting, which is when a model is too closely fit to the training data and does not generalize well to new data. This can result in high accuracy on the training data but poor performance on new data. Second, p-hacking can lead to models that are not reproducible or robust. If the data or analysis is manipulated, it can be difficult or impossible to reproduce the results or apply the model to new data, and finally p-hacking can lead to models that are biased or unfair. If the data or analysis is manipulated in a way that favors one group over another, the resulting model may perpetuate or even amplify existing biases in the data.

Wovenware included in the Gartner Market Guide

Steps to Avoid P-Hacking in Machine Learning

Malicious P-hacking is a big problem in academic research, but another equally large problem is unintentional P-hacking, which can lead businesses to waste valuable resources by unknowingly deploying ineffective machine learning models. An effective way to avoid unintentional P-hacking in machine learning is to separate your data into training and holdout sets so that, ideally, your model receives no information about the data in the holdout set during the experimentation and training phases of the model production cycle. It is only after we are confident that we have trained a promising model that we should test it against the holdout set. This approach provides the following key benefits:

  1. Ensures the reliability of performance results on the holdout set
  2. Saves costly data resources

Suppose we have a dataset which we partition into a training set and a holdout set. Taking the example a step further, suppose that every single time we train our model on the training set we proceed to test it on the holdout set, evaluate the results, and tune the model’s hyperparameters according to what we believe will improve its results on the holdout set. If we repeat this process dozens of times the consequence will be that we have unintentionally leaked information to our model about the data in the holdout set every time we modified our model’s hyperparameters in response to it. In practice we are violating the fundamental statistical assumption that our model is making predictions on previously unobserved data. In other words, we have conformed our model to the holdout set. Our model’s performance is no longer a reliable indicator of performance in-the-wild.

Collecting and labeling data is a time-consuming and costly effort. If we neglect the scenario described above and indiscriminately use all our data to train and test our model we would exhaust all the data that can give us reliable performance results. The only way to correct this would be to collect and label more data, spending more time and money, in order to test our model on previously unseen data which can give us reliable feedback of our model’s performance in-the-wild.

The best way to avoid unintentional P-hacking is to plan ahead and separate enough data in the holdout set. Use the holdout set to test the machine learning model only after you are confident that it’s promising. This may mean that you should split your holdout set into several subsets to avoid fitting your model to this data.

By following this strategy, you can be assured of your model’s reliability on previously unseen data and save time and money in the short term and a reliable and effective machine learning algorithm in the long term.

As digital transformation continues to drive innovation across industries, machine learning will become increasingly important for businesses seeking to gain insights from data. However, it is important to be aware of the potential pitfalls of machine learning and take steps to avoid them. By avoiding p-hacking and other statistical pitfalls, organizations can ensure that their machine learning models are accurate and reliable, and that they can make data-driven decisions with confidence.

P-Hacking a Statistical Pitfall of Machine Learning

Get the best blog stories in your inbox!